Pulseq

Why AFLW Stadiums Remain a Major Concern

· news

Why 10 Years Later Stadiums Are Still a Major Bugbear of the AFLW

The Australian Football League (AFL) Women’s competition is entering its 11th season, yet one issue persists: subpar stadiums that host games. The league’s decision to favor boutique venues has been criticized by women’s football community members, who argue that bigger facilities are necessary for growth and success.

Players have been vocal about their concerns regarding venue standards, citing issues with surface quality, capacity, access, and weather-proofing. James Gallagher, CEO of the AFL Players Association, noted that “AFLW games are played at many venues which vary in quality of facilities, surface, capacity, access and weather-proofing.” This variability impacts player experience, fan satisfaction, and broadcast quality.

The data from the AFL Players Association’s Insights and Impacts Report paints a stark picture: 11 out of 28 venues used across Australia last year were rated average or below for surface quality and facilities. These subpar venues hosted nearly a third of all games, with only three – Carrara Oval, Springfield Central Stadium, and Kardinia Park – receiving top marks from players.

The AFL’s reluctance to use larger stadiums is puzzling, especially given the demand for bigger venues. The decision not to host the grand final at Docklands Stadium, which has a capacity of over 53,000, is particularly notable. The fact that the last three AFLW grand finals at Princes Park sold out only underscores this point.

The introduction of double-headers raises questions about the league’s decision-making process. By hosting women’s games at tier-one venues, the league aims to increase exposure among existing men’s football fans. However, this approach also highlights inconsistencies in the league’s decisions. If the AFL genuinely believes that bigger stadiums can boost attendance and fan engagement, why not utilize them for standalone games as well?

Players and coaches want better venues to showcase their skills and provide a more compelling product for fans. As Bec Goddard, then-coach of Hawthorn, said after the inaugural AFLW game at Docklands Stadium in 2022, “Just give the women the opportunity to play in big stadiums, and the fans will come.” The data supports this assertion: when games are played at better venues, attendance figures increase, and fan engagement is higher.

As the AFLW continues to grow and develop, it’s essential that the league addresses these venue concerns head-on. By prioritizing bigger, better facilities, the competition can elevate its product, improve player satisfaction, and boost fan engagement. The question remains: will the AFL finally take heed of the criticism and provide the venues that players, coaches, and fans so desperately crave?

Reader Views

  • CS
    Correspondent S. Tan · field correspondent

    "The AFLW's continued reliance on boutique stadiums is a short-sighted decision that prioritizes style over substance. While the introduction of double-headers at tier-one venues may boost exposure for women's football, it also masks deeper issues with facility quality and capacity. The data suggests a concerning trend: players are consistently disadvantaged by subpar surfaces and inadequate infrastructure. Rather than experimenting with temporary fixes, the AFL should invest in long-term solutions that prioritize player experience and fan satisfaction – namely, upgrading existing facilities or building new ones."

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    The AFLW's stadium conundrum is more than just a matter of aesthetics – it's a harbinger for long-term viability. The league's fixation on boutique venues may win fans over with its quaint charm, but it's a Band-Aid solution for the bigger issue: a lack of investment in grassroots infrastructure. Without proper facilities, the AFLW risks stagnating at an elite level, unable to produce top-notch athletes or attract new participants who demand better. The numbers are clear – it's time for the league to stop tinkering and build towards a future with purposeful planning, not just pleasing presentations.

  • EK
    Editor K. Wells · editor

    The AFL's double-header strategy might be seen as a compromise on subpar venues, but it also raises concerns about crowding out women's games at larger stadiums. If the league truly wants to grow its audience, shouldn't they prioritize a consistent and quality experience for fans across all games? What happens when these double-headers are moved to smaller, less-equipped venues? Will women's football suffer from diminished attention as a result? It's time for the AFL to clarify their priorities: are they committed to upgrading venue standards or merely using tier-one stadiums as a marketing gimmick?

Related articles

More from Pulseq

View as Web Story →